You’ve probably seen some version of this line floating around financial social media: “Rich people don’t sell their assets — they borrow against them and then they die.” It gets shared like a secret cheat code, a loophole the wealthy use to avoid taxes while the rest of us pay our fair share every April.

The truth is more nuanced — and more interesting. The borrow-till-you-die strategy is real, it is powerful, and it is available to more people than just the ultra-wealthy. But it is also not a trick, not risk-free, and not something you should attempt without understanding exactly how it works and where it can go wrong.

This is the complete breakdown.

Join Infinity Investing’s Newsletter

Get Smarter About Money Every Week

Join 66,000+ members already on their path to financial freedom. Every week, Toby Mathis delivers plain-English investing insights straight to your inbox — no fluff, no hype, no spam.

Each week you’ll get:

• ✓ Real estate and stock market strategies that actually work
• ✓ Tax tips that keep more money in your pocket
• ✓ Asset protection moves most investors never hear about
• ✓ The wealth-building mindset shifts that change everything

The Core Concept: Why Borrowing Beats Selling

To understand the strategy, you first need to understand the tax problem it solves.

When you own an asset — a home, a stock portfolio, a business — and that asset grows in value over time, the profit you’ve accumulated on paper is called an unrealized capital gain. The IRS does not tax unrealized gains. You only owe capital gains tax when you sell, which is called a realization event.

This creates an interesting dynamic. If you need cash and you sell your appreciated asset, you trigger a tax bill — potentially 20% or more in federal capital gains tax, plus state taxes, plus the net investment income tax in some cases. Selling a $1 million asset with a low cost basis might net you only $650,000 to $700,000 after taxes and transaction costs.

But here’s the alternative: borrow against the asset instead of selling it.

Under Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code, loan proceeds are not considered taxable income. You’re not earning money — you’re borrowing it, with an obligation to repay. So if you pledge your appreciated asset as collateral and take out a loan, you receive cash without triggering any capital gains tax whatsoever.

You keep the asset. The asset keeps appreciating. And you have the cash you needed.

Then, when you eventually pass away, your heirs inherit the asset with what’s called a stepped-up basis — meaning the cost basis of the asset resets to its fair market value at the time of your death. The accumulated capital gains that built up over your lifetime effectively disappear for tax purposes. Your heirs can sell the asset, pay off any outstanding loans, and keep the remainder without owing a dime in capital gains tax.

That, in its simplest form, is the borrow-till-you-die strategy.

A Real-World Example: The Family Home

Let’s walk through a concrete illustration using the most familiar asset most Americans own.

Year 0: You buy a home for $400,000, financing it with a 30-year mortgage at 6.5%. The loan proceeds — all $400,000 — are not taxable.

Year 10: The home has appreciated at roughly the historical average. It’s now worth $615,000. Your loan balance has been paid down to about $340,000. Your equity is approximately $275,000, of which about $215,000 represents unrealized capital gains.

You need $150,000 for a major expense — a child’s college tuition, a rental property down payment, a business investment. You have two options:

• Option A: Sell the house, pay capital gains taxes on $215,000 of gains, and receive the proceeds after taxes and transaction costs.
• Option B: Take out a home equity line of credit (HELOC) for $150,000. Pay zero tax on those proceeds.

You choose Option B. You now have $150,000 in hand, still own the appreciating asset, and have paid no taxes.

Year 13: You pass away unexpectedly. The home is now worth $700,000. Your heirs inherit it with a stepped-up basis of $700,000 — the fair market value at the date of death. They sell the home, pay off the outstanding loan balance, and owe zero capital gains tax on the $300,000 of appreciation that accumulated during your lifetime.

Over 13 years, you borrowed a total of $550,000 — the original mortgage plus the HELOC — and the entire chain of transactions was tax-free. That’s the strategy in action.

The Stepped-Up Basis: The Engine Behind the Strategy

The stepped-up basis is not a loophole in the pejorative sense — it’s a deliberate feature of the tax code. When you inherit an asset, your cost basis becomes the fair market value at the time of inheritance, not the original purchase price paid by the decedent. This resets the capital gains clock entirely.

Combined with the tax-free nature of borrowing, the stepped-up basis creates a powerful two-part mechanism: access liquidity during your lifetime without taxes, then eliminate the deferred tax liability at death. The loan gets repaid from the asset proceeds. Whatever remains passes to heirs income-tax-free.

This is why wealthy families with large, long-held positions in stocks, real estate, and private businesses rarely sell those assets outright. Selling would crystallize decades of accumulated gains into an immediate tax bill. Borrowing and holding preserves both the capital and the compounding.

The Five Assets Rich People Borrow Against Most

The strategy works across a range of asset types. Here are the five most common, along with the honest assessment of each.

1. Public Stocks and Index Portfolios (Securities-Based Lines of Credit)

A securities-based line of credit, or SBLOC, allows you to borrow against a taxable brokerage account — stocks, bonds, ETFs — without selling the underlying positions. Major brokerages including Schwab, Fidelity, and Merrill offer these products.

The appeal is significant: no capital gains triggered, no disruption to positions, interest rates that are typically lower than other lending products, and access to liquidity without navigating a lengthy underwriting process. For investors with large taxable portfolios who need cash quickly, this is often the fastest and cheapest path.

The risk is real and should not be minimized. If your portfolio drops in value, the lender can issue a margin call — demanding additional collateral or forcing the liquidation of positions, potentially at the worst possible time. Sophisticated users of SBLOCs maintain significant buffers: low loan-to-value ratios, diversified collateral, and enough liquid reserves to handle a market downturn without a forced sale.

2. Real Estate

Real estate is the original borrow-against-it asset, and the one most familiar to everyday investors. Cash-out refinances, HELOCs, blanket loans across a portfolio — these are all well-established mechanisms for pulling equity out of appreciated property without triggering a taxable event.

Real estate has several advantages over other collateral types. Lenders are comfortable with it. Loan terms can be long — 30 years, even 40 years in some cases — which keeps monthly payments manageable. And crucially, the asset can often carry the debt itself: rental income pays the mortgage, meaning you’re not reaching into your personal cash flow to service the loan.

The strategy also stacks favorably with other real estate tax benefits — depreciation deductions, cost segregation studies, bonus depreciation, and 1031 exchanges — creating multiple layers of tax efficiency around the same asset.

The risk is leverage. When rents soften, vacancies rise, or interest rates spike, debt doesn’t take a break. The 2008 financial crisis was a vivid demonstration of what happens when leveraged real estate investors lack the cash flow or reserves to service their debt during a downturn.

3. Private Businesses and Concentrated Stock

For founders and entrepreneurs, this is the version of the strategy that generates the most headlines. A founder who builds a company over decades may hold shares worth tens of millions of dollars — shares they neither want to sell (which would trigger massive tax liability and potentially signal weakness to the market) nor can easily sell (because the position is large, illiquid, or subject to lockup agreements).

Private banks and specialty lenders will lend against these positions, providing liquidity that allows founders to fund their lifestyle, make investments, or diversify without selling. The business itself can also borrow against its assets and distribute proceeds to owners — another mechanism for accessing value without a taxable sale.

The risk here involves illiquidity and valuation uncertainty. Private lenders typically apply steep discounts to the collateral value of non-marketable assets, meaning loan-to-value ratios are lower than for publicly traded securities. And if the business hits trouble, the collateral can evaporate quickly.

4. Art and Collectibles

Yes, people borrow against paintings. Major private banks have dedicated art lending divisions, and it’s a more substantial market than most people realize. The mechanics are similar to other asset-backed lending: the art is appraised, a loan is extended against a percentage of the appraised value, and the owner retains possession — still living with the painting on their wall while the cash is deployed elsewhere.

The appeal is obvious. The risk is concentration and illiquidity. Art markets can be opaque and volatile, and during downturns, lenders can issue calls that force uncomfortable decisions. Interest rates on art-backed loans tend to be higher than on more liquid collateral. This is a strategy for the genuinely wealthy with diversified holdings, not a primary liquidity mechanism for people whose net worth is concentrated in a few pieces.

5. Life Insurance Cash Value (Policy Loans)

Permanent life insurance policies — whole life, indexed universal life — build cash value over time, and that cash value can be borrowed against through policy loans. This is the mechanism behind the “infinite banking” or “be your own bank” concepts that circulate in personal finance circles.

Policy loans are among the easiest forms of borrowing to access. There’s no credit check, no underwriting, and funds can typically be received within days. The loan is secured by the death benefit and cash value of the policy, and technically, repayment is optional during your lifetime — the loan balance is simply deducted from the death benefit when you pass.

The nuances matter significantly here. Some policies treat the loan as a “wash loan” where the interest charged equals the crediting rate on the borrowed cash value — effectively neutral. Other policies separate the loan and the cash value entirely, meaning the cash value continues to grow (or shrink) independently of the outstanding loan. If the policy underperforms and the loan accrues significant interest, the policy can collapse — wiping out both the death benefit and the cash value.

This is a legitimate and sophisticated financial instrument when properly designed and managed. It is not a push-button money machine, and the design of the policy matters enormously.

What the Critics Get Right

No honest treatment of this strategy ignores the legitimate criticisms. There are three worth taking seriously.

1. Interest Is a Real Cost, Not a Loophole

Borrowing is not free. Every dollar borrowed accrues interest, and that interest must be serviced — either through income, cash flow from the asset, or by rolling it into the loan balance. The strategy only makes mathematical sense when the cost of borrowing is less than the combined cost of selling: the tax bill, the lost appreciation on the sold asset, and any transaction costs.

When assets are appreciating steadily and interest rates are low, this calculation favors borrowing by a wide margin. When interest rates spike or asset values stagnate, the math can reverse quickly. The strategy is not an unconditional win — it’s a conditional one.

2. It Creates Structural Advantages for Asset Owners

This criticism is fair and worth acknowledging. A wage earner who needs $10,000 must earn roughly $15,000 before taxes to have $10,000 to spend. An asset owner who needs $10,000 can borrow it directly and spend all $10,000 — no taxes, no friction. The playbook is theoretically available to anyone, but as a practical matter, you need appreciated assets to execute it. Getting into the position to use this strategy requires either accumulating assets over time or inheriting them.

This dynamic is one reason policymakers periodically discuss reforms to the stepped-up basis and to securities-backed lending — though as of today, no substantive changes have been enacted.

3. Leverage Amplifies Both Gains and Losses

The strategy looks elegant when asset values rise and interest rates fall. It looks very different when the opposite occurs. The 2008 financial crisis produced foreclosures, margin calls, and forced liquidations across every asset class. Investors who were leveraged to the hilt with insufficient cash reserves were wiped out — not because the underlying assets were permanently worthless, but because they couldn’t service their debt long enough for the recovery to arrive.

Leverage is a tool. Like all tools, it can build things or cause serious damage depending on how it’s used.

Who This Strategy Works For — and Who It Doesn’t

The borrow-till-you-die strategy is well-suited for people who:

• Hold significantly appreciated assets — real estate, stocks, business interests — with a low cost basis relative to current value
• Have stable cash flow to service debt without straining personal finances
• Maintain conservative loan-to-value ratios and liquidity buffers against volatility
• Have a long time horizon, allowing compounding to work across decades
• Are engaged in coordinated estate planning that accounts for stepped-up basis and the transfer of assets to heirs

The strategy tends to go wrong for people who:

• Borrow too aggressively, with insufficient margin between loan balance and asset value
• Ignore interest rate risk, particularly on adjustable-rate instruments
• Lack liquidity reserves to handle a margin call or collateral call without a forced sale
• Borrow against depreciating or non-cash-flowing assets that can’t service the debt independently
• Treat leverage as a lifestyle rather than a precisely calculated tool

That last point deserves emphasis. The version of this strategy that works is disciplined, conservative, and coordinated with a broader financial plan. The version that blows up is the one where borrowing becomes a way of life, leverage accumulates without proper risk management, and the first significant market disruption triggers a cascade of forced sales.

The Bottom Line

The borrow-till-you-die strategy is not a secret, not a loophole, and not a trick. It is a straightforward application of how the tax code treats loan proceeds (not taxable) and inherited assets (stepped-up basis), combined with the basic principle that keeping an appreciating asset whole and compounding is often more valuable than selling it and paying the tax bill.

When executed with discipline — low leverage, proper risk controls, assets that generate their own cash flow, and estate planning that coordinates the stepped-up basis — it is one of the most powerful wealth-building and wealth-preservation mechanisms available.

When executed recklessly — maximum leverage, no liquidity reserves, assets that can’t carry the debt, and no plan for what happens when markets move against you — it is a reliable path to financial ruin.

The strategy works beautifully as a tool. It fails badly when it becomes a habit.

Ready For The Next Steps On Building Your Wealth? Talk to one of our agents